Page 28 of 28 FirstFirst ... 232425262728
Results 271 to 277 of 277

Thread: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

  1. #271
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,652

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by racrawford65 View Post
    Aside from the great people/customer service, great ethics, and awesome products, yet another reason to love Ascend - value for money.
    Thank you so much for the nice comments!!! They are greatly appreciated
    .
    .
    .
    Good Sound To You!

    David Fabrikant
    www.ascendacoustics.com

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by davef View Post
    I agree with this... We should have priced these much higher. For example, our CMT-340SE2 easily compares with the Arendal 1723 THX. Spinorama rates the 1723 THX with a tonality rating of 5.1 while Spinorama rates our 340SE2 with a tonality rating of 5.5. While this difference is quite minor, the Arendal 1723 THX costs ~$2K for the pair and our 340SE2 is $798 for the pair. And our 340SE2 has about 2dB higher sensitivity while the 1723 THX has a bit deeper bass extension.

    That stated, I just don't feel comfortable jacking up retail pricing just to get consumers to consider it who think retail price is a reflection of performance. That doesn't sit right with me, and never will.
    Yes, this is much more valuable product, the price makes it icing on the cake. I introduced CMT to 3 or 4 of my friends, gave them some of my older pairs, no one wants to return them. That's why I had to purchase the SE2. It is that good, with a sub (rythmik) it can beat many expensive towers with the midrange tonality.

    Subs also I tried a number of them SVS / Monoprice (THX certified). Rythmik makes a world of difference in intricate integration. The musical value of direct servo is evidently visible. It may be a few hundred bucks more than some of the lower priced competitors, but the value is gold standard.

  3. #273
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    1,527

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Jeez, I may need to buy a pair of 340's just to check them out. Could always take them to my other house to use as mains instead of the HTM200's there currently. Would definitely improve the bass since I don't have a sub there yet.
    * LG OLED65E6P, BenqHT2050A
    * Anthem AVM90, Rogue ST100, VTV Pascal 7 ch
    * Sierra Towers/Horizon (all ELX RAAL), S2EXv2 surrounds, HTM200SEx4 heights, Rythmik E15HPx2
    * VPI Classic 1+ (VTA & Fatboy Gimbal), PE Eagle/RR, VAS NOVA, Soundsmith Paua, Manley Chinook, Bob's Devices SUT, SugarCube 1 mini
    * Oppo 203 & 103D, EverSolo DMP-A6
    * miniDSP Flex, Audiosensibility & Blue Jeans cables, Symposium & Isoacoustics, GIK
    * For RDJ: Anthem MRX720, Sierra LX, Luna Duo v2 center, CXNv2, TBD

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    60

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    I had a pair of original CMT 340 Classic LCR's (pre SE versions) and even those sound terrific with home theater. I gifted them to a friend who's enjoying them in his basement for streaming, TV, and video games. He couldn't be happier. Can't imagine how much of an improvement the SEv2's are. My current main system are Sierra LX's.

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by davef View Post
    I agree with this... We should have priced these much higher. For example, our CMT-340SE2 easily compares with the Arendal 1723 THX. Spinorama rates the 1723 THX with a tonality rating of 5.1 while Spinorama rates our 340SE2 with a tonality rating of 5.5. While this difference is quite minor, the Arendal 1723 THX costs ~$2K for the pair and our 340SE2 is $798 for the pair. And our 340SE2 has about 2dB higher sensitivity while the 1723 THX has a bit deeper bass extension.
    When I bought my Perlisten S7ts for mains and was looking for complimentary surrounds my first thought was the Perlisten R5m's. I'm sure they're great, but at $3k each they're outrageously expensive and the Spinorama measurements for them and the 340SE2s are nearly identical (the "with sub" score for both is 8.2). Even with my OCD screaming to get "matching" surrounds I just couldn't justify the price difference for no performance increase... and the 340SE2s are actually a touch more sensitive. Easily the best deal in audio right now.

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,142

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by racrawford65 View Post
    Jeez, I may need to buy a pair of 340's just to check them out. Could always take them to my other house to use as mains instead of the HTM200's there currently. Would definitely improve the bass since I don't have a sub there yet.
    I think you should!
    The only issue may be they are much larger than the 200SE's.
    -curtis
    main/living room (5.1):
    - LG OLED 77" C3
    - Anthem AVM70, VTV AMPLIFIER 5 Channel 3+2 Purifi + Hypex
    - Sierra LX for LCR, HTM-200SE for surrounds, Rythmik F15HP
    - Eversolo DMP-A6, Oppo 205, AppleTV
    bedroom (2.1):
    - Vizio 65" P9
    - WiiM Ultra, Fosi V3 Mono x 2
    - Sierra Luna v2, RSL-10e sub
    - AppleTV
    I use Roon to manage the music streaming.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,142

    Default Re: And here it is, the 340SE2!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by goldark View Post
    I had a pair of original CMT 340 Classic LCR's (pre SE versions) and even those sound terrific with home theater. I gifted them to a friend who's enjoying them in his basement for streaming, TV, and video games. He couldn't be happier. Can't imagine how much of an improvement the SEv2's are. My current main system are Sierra LX's.
    I also had the original 340's.
    A friend and I took them to a local hi-fi shop to compare to $1k pair of speakers...I forget which. At the time the CMT-340 was (if I remember correctly...it was a while ago) $598 for a pair.
    We set them up and started playing music. The couple of sales reps came walked into the room to listen. The owner of the shop came out of his office to listen because they sounded so good as well. Then they asked how much they were. When I told them $600...they were surprised and all walked away. The owner said "wow, they sound great. My only criticism is the highs, I wish they were a little smoother". This is before Ascend started their work with Seas.
    -curtis
    main/living room (5.1):
    - LG OLED 77" C3
    - Anthem AVM70, VTV AMPLIFIER 5 Channel 3+2 Purifi + Hypex
    - Sierra LX for LCR, HTM-200SE for surrounds, Rythmik F15HP
    - Eversolo DMP-A6, Oppo 205, AppleTV
    bedroom (2.1):
    - Vizio 65" P9
    - WiiM Ultra, Fosi V3 Mono x 2
    - Sierra Luna v2, RSL-10e sub
    - AppleTV
    I use Roon to manage the music streaming.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •