Why jump from the 200 straight to the 340? What about the 170 for surrounds?
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Elite Member
Why jump from the 200 straight to the 340? What about the 170 for surrounds?
Senior Member
I think they would look far too homely given where they would be mounted. The shape of them just isn't right for it.
Member
I wouldn't wall mount the 340's because it needs more space but if your considering that or the 200's, I would buy he 340's. The small sacrifice you give the 340 in sound far outways the 200 on the best of days.
In all honesty, if money is no issue which is doesn't seem it is, the questions seem a bit strange. Kind of like saying sould I buy the 3 series BMW or the 7. Maybe I don't fully understand the question.
JH
Senior Member
Money is an issue. However, not as large an issue as being able to place the speakers for optimal sound. The 200s could definitely be mounted flush on the wall. The 340s would be a bit harder. I'd probably have to build a large custom stand or rig up some sort of dual mount to connect it to the wall while giving the port ample room.
Posting Permissions
