Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: sound meters

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Frank, I use a sound meter for a couple of things. First for level matching all of the different speakers. In other words, making sure each speaker sounds as loud at my listening positions. Second, I use the meter to see how balanced the frequencies are in my room. For example, I have a set of frequency tones on a cd and I play those tones at a reference level, measuring how those freqnecies at those reference levels actually produce a volume at my listening positions. This lets me know if I need to adjust equilization or cross overs frequencies.

    I also use it to measure how loud my baby screams and compare it to other well know baseline sounds, like jet engines and earthquakes.

    In theory, once you get everything set up, no need for the meter. I find, however, that any time I move my stuff, rearrange a room, or add new equipment, I want to check the basics with the meter.

    -Michael

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,057

    Default

    I use it for just about everything Michael uses it for too.

    I also use it when comparing speakers, since you want to compare when the speakers are at the same sound level.

    -curtis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    101

    Default

    thanks guys for the imformation

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    149

    Default

    I read on another forum that a commonly used Radio Shack meter is inaccurate at lower frequencies. It's now being replaced by another version (Though I don't know if it's necessarily because some people deemed it to be of suspect quality. It could just be time to bring another one to the market).

    Regardless, any recommendations for a sound meter?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    913

    Default

    While the Radioshack meter is not accurate at low frequencies, there is a commonly accepted set of correction values. Many other inexpensive meters are likely to be just as inaccurate, but you won't know the proper correction factor. I haven't seen much information on the replacement meter other than a picture, so I can't say if it is more or less accurate than the original.

    I don't have a good recommendation otherwise. If you want to spend some more money, you could go the TrueRTA route and get a measurement mic, mic pre-amp and software to do fairly extensive measurements - that would run about $150.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    149

    Default

    uhh, no.

    I'll stick with the cheaper kind, with or without inaccuracies!

    Thanks for the reply.. I'll get one of those Radio Shack versions, eventually.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Anyone have the correction link? I've printed out before but wasn't smart enough to put in my sound meter box and can't find it now..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,057

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    149

    Default

    doing my best Montgomery Burns impression..

    excellent!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •