Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
racrawford65
newbo101
What type(s) of music do you listen to? How loud?
If mainly jazz/classical/female vocals, you may prefer the EXV2. Although if you walk around alot (or listen to other types of music), the LX. Unless, of course, you go for the Towers. The LX dig deeper but are slightly less efficient. What are you using for amplification? I assume it will be enough for either bookshelf.
As to subwoofer, I'd try the speakers themselves first for music only before buying a sub or two (Rythmik, hint hint). If you are also doing movies, yes to a sub (or two) for the impact.
Thanks for the tips very helpful. I like to listen to all types of music, generally I would say low to medium volume, but sometimes loud (I don’t know how to quantify in db). Jazz, rock, pop, acoustics sometimes but I don’t worry too much about perfection since I’m coming from a low base (soundbar).
I haven’t decided on amp yet - any recommendations? I’m doing my research in parallel but want to settle on speakers first then decide amp. I’ve seen good feedback on Arcam, SA30, though not necessarily in the context of these speakers. Also familiarizing with some of the Marantz and Rotel models.
I will use this setup for both stereo music and TV/movies. Might start off without the sub in any case but I’ll likely add one soon if bass feels missing.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Looking for an amplifier only, integrated amp, or an AVR?
Since it's both music and TV/movies, an AVR might be your best bet (or a processor + amplifier, but adds cost). For an AVR, look at Anthem MRXx40 series (good for 2 channel and surround).
No comments on Marantz or Rotel as I've not listened to either recently.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
I was thinking integrated amp. Keep it simple since I’m building a system for the first time. Is the AVR a requirement for TV connectivity? I don’t plan to add other speakers or peripherals any time soon, TV and movies just through streaming so far. So aiming to start with more basic and upgrade over time if I need it.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
No, AVR isn't required for TV connectivity as long as the integrated amp has inputs for the tv audio out.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
racrawford65
No, AVR isn't required for TV connectivity as long as the integrated amp has inputs for the tv audio out.
For a modern TV, it makes it much easier if there is a HDMI ARC (or better, eARC) on the back of the integrated amplifier or preamp. It allows the TV remote to control the volume on your speakers/preamp and visa versa. If you’re running stereo only, there are also simpler options depending on how much power you may need.
Another extremely simplistic set-up if you’re a music streamer and you’re sticking to 2 channels or 2 channels plus subwoofer is something like the WiiM amp. Except the WiiM amp is a little underpowered. ARC or eARC would be much better than the competing inputs (SPDIF, or analog). But this type of device really doesn’t allow for multi-channel upgrading.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bkdc
For a modern TV, it makes it much easier if there is a HDMI ARC (or better, eARC) on the back of the integrated amplifier or preamp. It allows the TV remote to control the volume on your speakers/preamp and visa versa. If you’re running stereo only, there are also simpler options depending on how much power you may need.
Another extremely simplistic set-up if you’re a music streamer and you’re sticking to 2 channels or 2 channels plus subwoofer is something like the WiiM amp. Except the WiiM amp is a little underpowered. ARC or eARC would be much better than the competing inputs (SPDIF, or analog). But this type of device really doesn’t allow for multi-channel upgrading.
I think HDMI ARC and eARC are a hit or miss, and can be frustrating. I think and good universal remote is a better option for a lot.
I have a WiiM amp being delivered tomorrow. I am debating on using it in my bedroom or using zone 2 on the pre/pro. The pre/pro will allow me to use room correction, but the WiiM would be so much easier to put together. I got the WiiM because I am assuming it will be Roon Ready in a couple of months. Yes...I am a streamer.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
WiiM amp is such a compelling offering at a fantastic price. Most people won’t need 1/2 the power when listening at modest levels in a small room. I wanted more “headroom” so for me it’s Bluesound Node -> class D Purifi based amplifier (from Buckeye Amp) with miniDSP Flex in between for EQ/DSP.
I pulled the trigger on a KEF LS50 Meta during the holiday sale and *ouch* my ears are fatiguing seriously….. after being pampered by the transparent and very pleasantly detailed Ascend Sierra-2EX (I own 3 pairs now), it was a bit of a shock to have my ears fatiguing from the well reviewed LS50 Metas. Gotta give it more time but if my ears keep telling me no, then it’ll be bye bye to an otherwise beautiful bookshelf.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bkdc
WiiM amp is such a compelling offering at a fantastic price. Most people won’t need 1/2 the power when listening at modest levels in a small room. I wanted more “headroom” so for me it’s Bluesound Node -> class D Purifi based amplifier (from Buckeye Amp) with miniDSP Flex in between for EQ/DSP.
I am using a 5-channel amp from VTV, three channels of Purifi and two with Hypex.
If I decide to use zone 2, I will get a two-channel class D amp.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
curtis
I am using a 5-channel amp from VTV, three channels of Purifi and two with Hypex.
If I decide to use zone 2, I will get a two-channel class D amp.
Can you tell the difference between the sound from the Purifi and Hypex modules? If so, what are you hearing that's different?
I'm asking because I'm trying to decide on which way to go with a Buckeye Amps three channel. I can't come up with any negatives for either. Both versions are supposed to be scary flat and transparent.
Asked another way, why not five of one or five of the other in your VTV? Why did you make the 3/2 split?
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bruce Watson
Can you tell the difference between the sound from the Purifi and Hypex modules? If so, what are you hearing that's different?
I'm asking because I'm trying to decide on which way to go with a Buckeye Amps three channel. I can't come up with any negatives for either. Both versions are supposed to be scary flat and transparent.
Asked another way, why not five of one or five of the other in your VTV? Why did you make the 3/2 split?
They sound exactly the same. Which is transparent. All solid state amplifiers sound the same unless there is intentional distortion (like a tube amp). Purchase should be based merely on specs and cost and your consideration of build quality and additional features in the input board and chassis. The new NcoreX is has a very low idle power use just like the Purifi amps. Benefit of European regulations limiting vampire power waste. The older Ncore modules draw a little more at idle. It’s the golden age of class D. They have reached perfection. Perfect transparency, SNR well beyond anything audible, inaudible or imperceptible distortion with the ability to drive crazy loads (400+ watts at 8ohms, even 900 watts at 2 ohms), 2 ohm stability, in a small portable 5 pound package that won’t break your back. Bruno Putzeys is a genius.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bruce Watson
Can you tell the difference between the sound from the Purifi and Hypex modules? If so, what are you hearing that's different?
I'm asking because I'm trying to decide on which way to go with a Buckeye Amps three channel. I can't come up with any negatives for either. Both versions are supposed to be scary flat and transparent.
Asked another way, why not five of one or five of the other in your VTV? Why did you make the 3/2 split?
I have never compared the different amp channels. I can tell you that I do think the front channels sound a bit more transparent than with my old 20 year old ATi 1505, but that can be wishful thinking.
VTV doesn't make a 5 channel Purifi amp, neither does Buckeye. I thought about doing a 3-channel amp and a 2-channel amp, but ultimately wanted one-chassis and didn't think I needed to spend extra on Purifi for the surrounds.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Curtis, curious if you asked either if they could do a custom 5 channel Purifi amp? Maybe using a six channel case with one set of outputs/inputs "blocked" off? Or maybe it's a size or power supply constraint?
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
racrawford65
Curtis, curious if you asked either if they could do a custom 5 channel Purifi amp? Maybe using a six channel case with one set of outputs/inputs "blocked" off? Or maybe it's a size or power supply constraint?
I actually, on a whim, asked Buckeye. Currently no plans, but that might change later in the year.
I was heading down the path of the newer/higher power Purifi module for the fronts, and the lower power for the surrounds. Then I came to my senses.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
LOL. Come on, buy some more new equipment!
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
racrawford65
LOL. Come on, buy some more new equipment!
As I have said before, you are a bad influence! :D
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
The issue with a 5-channel Purifi amp is the actual power supply/wattage.
For the 1ET400A, you’re talking about being able to handle 400watts/channel or 450 watts at 2ohms. That’s over 2000 watts. That exceeds the safe current limit for a 20 amp line with a 5-20P plug (most home electrical lines are 15 amp rated with a 5-15P). Just because the amplifier is light doesn’t mean it doesn’t require juice. Your circuit breakers would trip if you were approaching the limits (which is highly likely as you would be needing to drive five speakers to ear-bleeding levels). From a practical perspective, you can connect three 1ET400A to a Hypex SMPS 1200A400 so it is cost effective to do a two channel or three channel amplifier with amplifier modules connected to a single switch mode power supply unit and not worrying about whether you draw more than 15 amps.
This is also the reason why the reason why the 1ET7040SA comes only as a monoblock. It can supply 950 watts at 2 ohms! The 15 amp home line won’t handle 1900 watts safely (not that you would ever draw that much and bust your eardrums… you’d probably blow your speakers first).
If Buckeye wants to design a multi-channel speaker two separate power connections designed for two separate 20 amp lines……. This is not a practical solution.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
I believe D-Sonic has options for 2 power connections but their amps are much pricier.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bkdc
The issue with a 5-channel Purifi amp is the actual power supply/wattage.
I figured it was some sort of power issue.
Re: New: Sierra-2EX V2!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
racrawford65
I believe D-Sonic has options for 2 power connections but their amps are much pricier.
D-Sonic uses Pascal modules, I believe. They offer crazy power but measure worse than Ncore or Purifi, but the poorer measurement does not translate into any audible differences. The state of the art is Bruno Putzey’s offspring (Ncore, NcoreX, Purifi).
Who the @#$%@#% has a modern speaker needing 1500 watts a piece. (Pascal L-PRO2S running in BTL mode). They are for powering subwoofers. Big ones.
Edited : BTW, I listened to the D-Sonics about seven years ago…. I don’t think the modules have changed….. and there was an annoying audible hiss heard from 2 feet away. This was the same annoying issue I noticed with older ICEpower amplifiers. I hope things have changed. I LOVE the sound of complete silence from the Purifi’s. I can stick my ear to the driver and hear nothing.