spl_nut
06-11-2007, 11:05 PM
Hello everyone...
From my very limited lurking it seems I've found a decent place - Where opinions are actually discussed!
To my question...
From the Sierra introduction page:
"development of what we consider to be one of the highest performance loudspeakers ever offered."
Respectfully I ask, on what do you base the above statement?
Mutually understanding that fidelity is both objective and measurable - What experiences can you share that support such a claim?
Politely, I'm asking you to quantify... Perhaps set a reference that I, and others can relate.
Please realize that I'm not trying to rile anyone, and that If I've overlooked already stated answers, then please show me where I can find them.
...
Very modest equipment: Rotel RCD-1072, RC-1070 & RB-1080. Audioquest Copperheads (Audio Art soon) & ZU Julians. NAIM Wiremold connected to a dedicated circuit.
We've spent a week in-house with the Spendor S5e and thoroughly auditioned Gallo's 3.1s & ProAC's Reference 1SC.
EPOS' M12.2 was kicked after minutes of listening and the Monitor Audio RS8 pair we purchased were sent packing in no time.
Some of the speakers above are very, very capable - Yet, only the Gallos are even close to meeting expectations.
Our current 'short list' is Selah's SA-1, Dyn's Audience 42, the Sonus Faber Concertino Domus, ZU's Tone, Mark & Daniel's Maximus-Ruby, Audio Physic's Spark, BL Audio's two way - And to mix it up, Mag's MMG.
And the Sierra...
Would we be wasting Ascend's time and money by ordering a pair of Sierras? Knowing we'd fully take advantage of the return policy.
Fair question.
Peace... And if I've offended anyone, I apologize in advance :)
From my very limited lurking it seems I've found a decent place - Where opinions are actually discussed!
To my question...
From the Sierra introduction page:
"development of what we consider to be one of the highest performance loudspeakers ever offered."
Respectfully I ask, on what do you base the above statement?
Mutually understanding that fidelity is both objective and measurable - What experiences can you share that support such a claim?
Politely, I'm asking you to quantify... Perhaps set a reference that I, and others can relate.
Please realize that I'm not trying to rile anyone, and that If I've overlooked already stated answers, then please show me where I can find them.
...
Very modest equipment: Rotel RCD-1072, RC-1070 & RB-1080. Audioquest Copperheads (Audio Art soon) & ZU Julians. NAIM Wiremold connected to a dedicated circuit.
We've spent a week in-house with the Spendor S5e and thoroughly auditioned Gallo's 3.1s & ProAC's Reference 1SC.
EPOS' M12.2 was kicked after minutes of listening and the Monitor Audio RS8 pair we purchased were sent packing in no time.
Some of the speakers above are very, very capable - Yet, only the Gallos are even close to meeting expectations.
Our current 'short list' is Selah's SA-1, Dyn's Audience 42, the Sonus Faber Concertino Domus, ZU's Tone, Mark & Daniel's Maximus-Ruby, Audio Physic's Spark, BL Audio's two way - And to mix it up, Mag's MMG.
And the Sierra...
Would we be wasting Ascend's time and money by ordering a pair of Sierras? Knowing we'd fully take advantage of the return policy.
Fair question.
Peace... And if I've offended anyone, I apologize in advance :)