Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Curtis! I need your help!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,067

    Default

    Here is the message I got from Chu:

    I have been tracking your post about speakers both at avsforum and ascend forum and I have a question for you. I want to get some speakers for my HT setup but I don't know if I should go with 3 CBM-170 and 2 HTM-200 or just go with the HSU Ventiloquist... I know you have heard both and wanted to see which route you would go with since you seem to have the similar ears as me. I already have a sub so that doesn't matter. I don't mind spending the extra money ($250 vs. $700) on Ascend if the sound is that much better and is worth upgrading to. I haven't heard either one so I can't make that judgement. If you can get back to me ASAP, I would appreciate it greatly. Another note... I know you have heard the Axiom as well... and I was so close of getting them but decided to change my mind because of you but I could still consider those but it will run me close to $1100 (M22, VP150, Q8) for the system I want. I'm so confused and I just want the best system for the price. OH.BTW... I have a Denon 3803 as a receiver to drive the spearers. Thank you for your help!


    And here is what I asked him:

    How big is your room? What is the ratio of music to HT the system will be used for?

    For a small to small/medium room, I think the Ventriloquist is a great HT setup for HT, and good for music if you can get over the unconventional way it handles mids/mid-bass through the center channel.

    If you listen to anything more than 20% music, and/or the room is beyond small, as the percentage of music increases, and room gets bigger, I would easily go with Ascends.

    I would actually like to put a small system in my bedroom. I am debating between a Ventriloquist system, or a 3.1 Ascend setup. I am leaning more and more toward the Ascend setup.

    -curtis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3

    Default

    My living room is about 15 x 12... fairly small. I would like to setup a 7.1 system but because of my small space retriction, I won't be able to. As far as what I will be using them mainly for, I probably use about 70% for HT, 20% for gaming, and 10% for music. But my main concern would be for HT since that's what I enjoy the most. So, how does the Ventiloquist hold up against the Ascends? How would you rate each system in terms of HT from 1 to 10 scale? Would either system be way better than retail market speakers like polk, JBL, or **** setup?

    Chu

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,067

    Default

    In my opinion, each system provides more for your dollar than similar priced systems that are available in retail.

    The Ascends are easily a higher quality sounding setup. If the price difference is not a concern, get the Ascends. The Ventriloquist sounds great for its size.....but it definitely sounds "smaller" and "thinner".

    I would do four CBM-170's and the CMT-340c center, and will still be less expensive than the Axiom setup you purchased, and depending on tastes, better.

    -curtis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •