Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: 200s vs. 170s vs. 340s

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ellsworth, ME
    Posts
    144

    Default 200s vs. 170s vs. 340s

    This may be a totally subjective question, but if there are any objective facts, this should be the forum to find out!

    I'm going to have a small, (13ft wide x 16ft long x 8ft high) room in my new house for a home theater. It will have a door, so it can be totally sealed. So that's only about 1700 cubic feet.

    I plan on using a nice Infinite Baffle subwoofer to handle the 80hz and below sound.

    So my question is this: Since the HTM-200s can go down to 80hz, is there any advantage to getting CBM-170s or CMT-340s? Right now, I'm under the assumption that the sound between 80hz-20khz is the same or close to it on all three of these.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    913

    Default

    There are differences and I think most agree that the difference between 200 and 170 is greater than the one between the 170 and 340, particularly for a smaller room. That, and the fact that the 170s only cost a bit more than 200s, lead me to generally recommend 170s across the front and 200s in the rear if you're looking to save money. This assumes that the size difference is not an issue. I'm sure there will be some other opinions too.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I'm with BradJudy. If you are trying to get the least expensive setup for your room I'd go with 170s across the front and 200s in the rear. If you wanted to spend a little more money get a 340 center, 170 left and right, 200 rears.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ellsworth, ME
    Posts
    144

    Default

    I guess I *am* looking at size as a consideration, which is why I'm looking at the HTM-200s. CSW http://tinyurl.com/68nuz has there MC200s which have almost identical specs to the HTM. Probably a good idea to get a pair of each and try them out, huh?

    If anyone knows of any other small, wall mountable speakers that go down to 80hz and cost less than $150 each, let me know. I think the Onyx ELTs might fill the bill too.

    I'm going to have to live with these for a long time, so I don't mind spending a little time and money trying them out!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ellsworth, ME
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Also, I read somewhere that Dr. Hsu (you know, the guy who builds some decent subwoofers) prefers the HTM-200s over the CBM-170s. Something about the 200s being more "forward".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    913

    Default

    As you mentioned, the ELTs are another option. They are bigger than the 200s, but smaller than the 170s. You gain a wood finish (and a premium finish extra cost option) but you lose the mounting screw threads that the Ascends have. These trade-offs depend on your decor/tastes and how you wanted to mount them. If you're looking at using omnimount style mounts, the threaded holes are a definite plus.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,032

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S_rangeBrew
    Also, I read somewhere that Dr. Hsu (you know, the guy who builds some decent subwoofers) prefers the HTM-200s over the CBM-170s. Something about the 200s being more "forward".
    Yup....this is true. I first demo'd Ascends at the Hsu facilities. Dr. Hsu prefers a more forward sound.
    -curtis

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17

    Default

    OK, I'll bite. What is "more forward sound"?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Fort Smith, Arkansas
    Posts
    51

    Default

    I dunno. Someone care to explain what more forward is?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,538

    Default

    What is "more forward sound"?
    Here is what I use to explain it... and this is using general terminology (there is no specific definition)

    A "forward" sounding speaker tends to make the vocals sound like they are coming from a point dead center in between and in front of the speakers, or more defined as directly in front of you

    A "laid back" speaker tends to make the vocals sound like they are coming from further away...

    Another good explanation is imagine you are at a concert hall, a forward sounding speaker might make the presentation sound like you are in the first 10 rows... a more laid back speaker from a distance of maybe 50 rows back.

    All of our loudspeakers are designed to present an accurate performance presentation such that the perceived distance of the singer in reference to the other performers is consistent with stage positioning and also how the recording engineering intended it to be heard.

    Hope this helps!
    .
    .
    .
    Good Sound To You!

    David Fabrikant
    www.ascendacoustics.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •