Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SouthWest of Cleveland
    Posts
    1,924

    Default DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Ok Ascend folks, here's my latest quandary.
    I currently stream music in these steps:
    1) TIDAL App on my iPhone hooked up to;
    2) Cambridge Audio ID100 Digital Dock, which sends the digital bitstream of the iPhone
    to;
    3) Marantz SR6003 AVR, using its DAC to decode the digital stream and send the analog
    signal in Pure-Direct to;
    4) Rythmik Direct Servo plate amp "IN" RCA, which applies 80Hz bass filtering of the
    "OUT" RCA, which feeds;
    5) Adcom GFA-5500 2-channel amp, powering;
    6) Sierra-2's

    It sounds pretty darn nice. So my question is.....Would a highly regarded outboard DAC, in this case the Schiit Bifrost Multibit, make a noticeable & worthwhile upgrade over a receiver's built-in DAC? Has anyone made a similar move or know anyone who has and noticed any benefits?

    Thanks!
    Ed

    * Sierra-2EX's W/V2 crossover upgrade
    * (2) Rythmik F12's
    * Parasound Halo P6
    * Audio by Van Alstine DVA-M225 Monoblock Amps
    * MiniDSP 2x4HD For Sub calibration
    *World's Best Cables Canare 4S11 speaker cables

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    457

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    I have a Marantz AV7701 and a Schiit Bifrost Multibit. I primarily use the Marantz because I watch a lot of 5.1 stuff and use the Bifrost mostly with headphones, but, when I do want to listen to music in a dedicated 2.1 system, sometimes I'll use the Bifrost instead. It definitely has a bigger soundstage, better imaging, and even better bass definition to my ears. If you do a lot of music critical listening, I would definitely suggest the upgrade.
    -Alex
    PS4/Nvidia Shield --> Emotiva XMC-1 --> Emotiva XPA-5 --> Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers and Horizon Center w/ RAAL tweeters (L/C/R), HTM-200 SE (Surrounds), 2x Rythmik F12 subwoofers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,032

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    My 2 cents:

    I've heard a fair number of DACs. While do believe some sound different, it is all a matter of taste. I never thought one really sounded better than another.

    I've never heard one change the soundstage or imaging. Those characteristics are how a speaker distributes sound, and a DAC doesn't/can't control that.
    Last edited by curtis; 10-28-2016 at 09:11 AM.
    -curtis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    457

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Quote Originally Posted by curtis View Post
    My 2 cents:

    I've heard a fair number of DACs. While do believe some sound different, it is all a matter of taste. I never thought one really sounded better than another.

    I've never heard one change the soundstage or imaging. Those characteristics are how a speaker distributes sound, and a DAC doesn't/can't control that.
    You should really look into Schiit Multibit technology. It is very different from the Delta Sigma DACs that compromises 99% of everything else out there. It's the only DAC that provides a closed form solution to the waveform, not an approximation. It also operates around 14 bits of dynamic range, whereas a DS DAC is somewhere around 4 I believe. It's quite a different experience to my ears.

    I agree with you though on DS DACs, there aren't very huge differences between them, just different implementations and filters that can sound a bit different.

    As for the imaging and soundstage comment, it's actually a lot more apparent on my LCD-2 headphones fed through my Asgard 2 amp. They don't have that wide of a soundstage normally, but the Bifrost really opens it up. On the Sierra Towers, I feel like the DS DAC in my Marantz is great for surround audio, but in stereo it doesn't feel like the towers are doing everything that I know they can sometimes. The Bifrost Multibit gives it that extra bit of clarity that allows the speakers to sound their fullest, to me. Googling around on reviews and Head-Fi it looks like a lot of people agree that it does have that effect for their systems.
    Last edited by sludgeogre; 10-28-2016 at 09:35 AM.
    -Alex
    PS4/Nvidia Shield --> Emotiva XMC-1 --> Emotiva XPA-5 --> Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers and Horizon Center w/ RAAL tweeters (L/C/R), HTM-200 SE (Surrounds), 2x Rythmik F12 subwoofers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    57

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes there is room for improvement.. AFAIK you had to be on iOS7 or later for digital audio output and those are only limited to 16bit audio.. While im not familiar with the Cambridge product I believe I came across a statement on their site that the ID10 didn't officially support TIDAL. In addition I doubt the dock is based on asynchronous usb audio technology. I would imagine is is functioning as more of a ADC and then you are converting again. Therefore you might want to try a newer iphone with an older gen apple TV over toslink or newer HDMI via Apple airplay, that should be closer to bitperfect. Or better yet the TIDAL desktop app wired direct. The Marantz has a decent DAC probably a cirrus 4382a, but you you could try an external DAC like the schitt and see if you prefer it. I'm using a Meridian Explorer since I don't have any streaming capabilities in my Anthem 520 to my SRT's and I really like it.
    Last edited by eyecatcher; 10-28-2016 at 10:48 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SouthWest of Cleveland
    Posts
    1,924

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Quote Originally Posted by eyecatcher View Post
    I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes there is room for improvement.. AFAIK you had to be on iOS7 or later for digital audio output and those are only limited to 16bit audio.. While im not familiar with the Cambridge product I believe I came across a statement on their site that the ID10 didn't officially support TIDAL. In addition I doubt the dock is based on asynchronous usb audio technology. I would imagine is is functioning as more of a ADC and then you are converting again. Therefore you might want to try a newer iphone with an older gen apple TV over toslink or newer HDMI via Apple airplay, that should be closer to bitperfect. Or better yet the TIDAL desktop app wired direct. The Marantz has a decent DAC probably a cirrus 4382a, but you you could try an external DAC like the schitt and see if you prefer it. I'm using a Meridian Explorer since I don't have any streaming capabilities in my Anthem 520 to my SRT's and I really like it.
    Not sure of all that, but here is a link to the dock: https://techsupport.cambridgeaudio.c...er-iPod-docks-

    Tech specs: https://techsupport.cambridgeaudio.c...-Specification

    The dock bypasses the internal DAC completely so no analog conversion. I was using an iPhone 5s and now a 7 with latest ios. I have the Hi-Fi Tidal subscription. I also have a FLAC Player app on my iPod Touch with a few dozen lossless files from HDTracks I play through the system. I don't have a readout on the Marantz telling me what bitrate is being sent. It sounds better to me than playing CD's through my dedicated CD player.
    Ed

    * Sierra-2EX's W/V2 crossover upgrade
    * (2) Rythmik F12's
    * Parasound Halo P6
    * Audio by Van Alstine DVA-M225 Monoblock Amps
    * MiniDSP 2x4HD For Sub calibration
    *World's Best Cables Canare 4S11 speaker cables

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    457

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Quote Originally Posted by Mag_Neato View Post
    Not sure of all that, but here is a link to the dock: https://techsupport.cambridgeaudio.c...er-iPod-docks-

    Tech specs: https://techsupport.cambridgeaudio.c...-Specification

    The dock bypasses the internal DAC completely so no analog conversion. I was using an iPhone 5s and now a 7 with latest ios. I have the Hi-Fi Tidal subscription. I also have a FLAC Player app on my iPod Touch with a few dozen lossless files from HDTracks I play through the system. I don't have a readout on the Marantz telling me what bitrate is being sent. It sounds better to me than playing CD's through my dedicated CD player.
    Since you are using the dock as a transport (it's optical audio output) you're totally fine to use the phone in the way you're doing it.
    -Alex
    PS4/Nvidia Shield --> Emotiva XMC-1 --> Emotiva XPA-5 --> Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers and Horizon Center w/ RAAL tweeters (L/C/R), HTM-200 SE (Surrounds), 2x Rythmik F12 subwoofers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SouthWest of Cleveland
    Posts
    1,924

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Quote Originally Posted by sludgeogre View Post
    The Bifrost has an optical input and that's what the OP is using, optical output from the dock. I wouldn't connect it via USB. It works fine on Android devices through OTG, but iPhones can be wonky.
    Yes, optical connection. Good guess. I could use coax as well but prefer optical. The dock does not have a dac of its own, it simply extracts the digital bitstream from the iPhone and passes it on to the receiver.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    57

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Shouldn't be much difference in optical vs coax. I like optical too. It would work. The dock must support the apple USB core audio. Since it is either that or analog audio on the 30pin connector. But it's unknown what bit/sample rate it outputting. I suspect the stream would go down to 48khz or 96 for compatibility from the original source. Imho I would recommend eliminating it from the chain since it could lose some resolution and introduce jitter before the dac.
    Last edited by eyecatcher; 10-29-2016 at 02:01 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    457

    Default Re: DAC in AVR vs Dedicated DAC

    Quote Originally Posted by eyecatcher View Post
    Shouldn't be much difference in optical vs coax. I like optical too. It would work. The dock must support the apple USB core audio. Since it is either that or analog audio on the 30pin connector. But it's unknown what bit/sample rate it outputting. I suspect the stream would go down to 48khz or 96 for compatibility from the original source. Imho I would recommend eliminating it from the chain since it could lose some resolution and introduce jitter before the dac.
    I don't think there is any audible difference between coax and optical unless you're talking about long cable lengths, where optical will perform better.

    If the dock is able to extract the full bit stream from the phone it should output whatever sample rate your file is. If it's downsampling it would have to be doing a lot more processing, and I'm pretty sure the dock isn't doing that. Previous Apple computers have been limited at 24/96 output and the phones may be the same, but that should have no effect on the dock transferring anything that the phone can.

    But yes, iPhone and Apple audio stuff can be wonky and I prefer to just use my PC with Foobar or my iBasso DX80 as a transport.
    -Alex
    PS4/Nvidia Shield --> Emotiva XMC-1 --> Emotiva XPA-5 --> Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers and Horizon Center w/ RAAL tweeters (L/C/R), HTM-200 SE (Surrounds), 2x Rythmik F12 subwoofers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •