Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Rel vs rhythmic

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    24

    Default Rel vs rhythmic

    Anyone have any experience with both!? What are your thoughts?
    I have had the chance to audition the Rel T9, s2, s3,s5. I was told that the Rel subs integrate so well with music because they have such short time delays, and typically subwoofers have a much larger time delay. Can anyone shed some light on this for me?

    Should I buy Rel over rythimic? Or rythimic over rel? And why?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,045

    Default Re: Rel vs rhythmic

    What's the cost of the Rels?

    Rythmik subs, especially the sealed versions, also have excellent decay times.
    -curtis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    24

    Default Re: Rel vs rhythmic

    The subs that I have listed to are between 1300-3500 Canadian, since the dollar is terrible. The F12se would be close to 1900 shipped

    I'm curious at the differences and personal experiences from other members? Why pick one over the other.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    457

    Default Re: Rel vs rhythmic

    I haven't heard REL subs, but the Rythmik F12 subs I have are the most accurate subs I've ever heard, while still being powerful and/or punchy when needed. You have to remember that with Rythmik you're getting servo technology as well that makes these subs extremely stable and accurate. You won't be overloading them and they won't ever sound bloated.

    With Rythmik, you also get a much more powerful amp, bigger, more substantial drivers, more tuning options, and configurable input options.

    I really think the Rythmik subs take the cake in every case in terms of value.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •