Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Thread: Alternative to Ryhmik

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    219

    Default Alternative to Ryhmik

    I am here to ask what would be a great alternative to Rythmik? I owned the F12 with my Sierra 2 and I am looking for something different. I have nothing negative to say about the Rythmik. I just prefer a little more boom sound. I know it's not right to have it but I like the bloom/boom. This is for a 2.1 audio only system in a small 11-15 room.
    Speakers are RAAL towers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,041

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Have you adjusted the Rythmik...you can adjust the damping to give you more bloom/boom. Play with the extension/damping switches to see if that will give you what you want.

    Also use the PEQ to give you a boost in the 60-100hz range.
    Last edited by curtis; 01-04-2016 at 01:24 PM.
    -curtis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    219

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Quote Originally Posted by curtis View Post
    Have you adjusted the Rythmik...you can adjust the damping to give you more bloom/boom. Play with the extension/damping switches to see if that will give you what you want.

    Also use the PEQ to give you a boost in the 60-100hz range.
    I don't have the Rythmik anymore, as I sold it off a while ago. I have been using my Martin Logan Grotto. I wouldn't mind getting a sub that I can use either ported or closed. Maybe SVS etc..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,041

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Quote Originally Posted by ematthews View Post
    I don't have the Rythmik anymore, as I sold it off a while ago. I have been using my Martin Logan Grotto. I wouldn't mind getting a sub that I can use either ported or closed. Maybe SVS etc..
    Ahh...got it.

    It will be interesting to see what you find to your liking because sub companies are mostly aiming for clean and accurate vs bloom/boom.
    -curtis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St George UT & Glenwood Springs CO
    Posts
    432

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    What about the ported Rythmiks? I don't know if they are boomy but they might be better for stupendous theater effects.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,551

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    I would recommend giving the Rythmik LV12R a try...
    .
    .
    .
    Good Sound To You!

    David Fabrikant
    www.ascendacoustics.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    455

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Quote Originally Posted by ematthews View Post
    I am here to ask what would be a great alternative to Rythmik? I owned the F12 with my Sierra 2 and I am looking for something different. I have nothing negative to say about the Rythmik. I just prefer a little more boom sound. I know it's not right to have it but I like the bloom/boom. This is for a 2.1 audio only system in a small 11-15 room.
    Speakers are RAAL towers.

    I suggest reading the recent article over at Audioholics. It might help you articulate, for yourself and others, what you are really looking for.

    http://www.audioholics.com/room-acou...ation-of-sound

    Just don't start reading the forum posts that follow, as there are people that get into nonsense about bragging about hitting 120 dB + in their room, etc.

    I am guessing that you might want more impact that you feel in some way that is described in the article. If that is the case then get a capable sub in your room and you can boost certain regions to give you the tactile sensation you are looking for, while still having an accurate sub with good transient response and low distortion, etc.

    Is your room 11 by 15 sealed, or open to the whole house? Many newer homes have an open concept layout. For the room to be pressurized you need to take the entire space that the listening area is opened to. It could be your sub was way too small for the space.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    291

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Now that i think about it, you might actually be able to use just the bass management on the 8801.
    Not sure if is a good idea to split your sub out to 3 though. You will need to use the adjustment on the sub woofer settings.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Zanesville Ohio
    Posts
    57

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Thanks , I think I should give Dave and Dina a call .. I have 2 F12s and was going (possibly) with 2 Mid Bass Modules .. One on each side of couch .. What did you mean by "3".. Was you thinking I only had one sub?.. I would actually be splitting them out to 4 right? .
    If its going to be a unwise move ,I am considering using 2 340s in the surround spots and taking my smaller satellites down .. I'm sure it seams like overkill, but video concerts (I think) would be killer ..If I go this route, I'm going with 4 subs...Well actually, I'm going with a couple more subs whichever way I choose to go .. I will pick up a couple F15HPs for the back of the room and then decide whether the mid bass'es are a good route or not .. This is probably the best way to put headphones in my living room ( LOL) for theses video concerts ..I already was talking to Rob... AKA FirstReflect, about setting up the 4 subs,,, but the 340s are something new I'm considering ..
    Last edited by Wanger 714; 02-01-2016 at 04:00 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    291

    Default Re: Alternative to Ryhmik

    Yes i thought it would be three subs, in your case 4.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •