Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: CEA-2010 Rating LV12r?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    101

    Default Re: CEA-2010 Rating LV12r?

    Here are anwsers to other commonly asked questions:

    1) Why is our sub more expensive?
    A: As I explain above the our subs have higher resolution. We can hear the impact of components on sound quality. Our amplifiers are solidly built. Big toroid transformer and big power caps and therefore more expensive.

    2) Other manufacturers have DSP and therefore is more accurate.
    A: DSP is no substitute for servo. Servo is a feedback done by taking motional signal at where the action is originated. Where can DSP correct that with the same amount of accuracy? Using a microphone at your listening position? That will have too low signal to noise ratio. The highest signal noise ratio is correcting it at where the action takes place, not some 8ft 15 ft away. An analogy is Hubble telescope that required correction to the lens. How was that problem resolved? By implementing a DSP on the sensor signal? That will be proven to be ineffective because each pixel on the sensor receives optical information from everywhere on the lens summed together. Instead it is done by another correction lens in front of original lens. There is no way DSP can achieve what servo can achieve because they are designed for different objectives.
    Last edited by RythmikAudio; 02-06-2015 at 09:10 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •