Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Would this work...?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15

    Default

    they start at 10' at the back wall, and go up to... alot... probably 20' above where the tv/stereo are located (these are approximate as i havent had time to measure b/c i have been out of town for 2 weeks and dont get back till tomorrow). i know this isnt the most accoustically sound room, but its all i have to deal w/. the side wall is 12'

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,052

    Default

    That is a lot of cubic feet for the STF-2 to deal with. You might want to talk to Ascend or Hsu for the best model and/or placement.

    -curtis

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SouthWest of Cleveland
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    My room is 13'x 18' w/8' ceiling. I use a PSB subsonicIII(12'woofer,180watts) and is usually sufficient for good bass. If you are in doubt about the STF-2 and think you may utilize a higher output sub in the future, get the STF-3 and simply run it with it's gain turned down for now. Once you move to a house where sound levels won't be an issue, just turn the sub's gain up for increased output.

    Ed

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15

    Default

    aww man i was trying to stay away from spending alot on a sub[B)]. i'll have to wait till i get home and make some measurements, then i'll probably call the Ascend folks and see what they have to say. of course the idea of spending a little more now on the sub so i dont have to upgrade later is a good one... just have to save up some more $$

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SouthWest of Cleveland
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Why is the price jump from the -2 to the -3 $200, when the jump from the -1 to the -2 is only $100? The -3 must be a much bigger upgrade from the -2 than the -2 is over the -1! Roger? Over! Unger? Out!!!("And don't call me Shirley!")

    Ed

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15

    Default

    they sneak that other $100 in the vtf2 mk 2, which is only has 50 watts more power than the stf2, basically $2 for every watt of power... hurts my wallet

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,052

    Default

    Don't forget the variable tuning in the VTF series as well.

    -curtis

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charter Oak, Iowa
    Posts
    579

    Default

    <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Arial, Verdana, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Mag_Neato

    Why is the price jump from the -2 to the -3 $200, when the jump from the -1 to the -2 is only $100? The -3 must be a much bigger upgrade from the -2 than the -2 is over the -1! Roger? Over! Unger? Out!!!("And don't call me Shirley!")

    Ed
    <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">


    I'm feeling dizzy.[]

    Randy

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15

    Default

    so.. what would work best per $ for all that freakin cubic footage, the big stf-3 at $599 or the vtf-2 mk2 with the variable tuning for $499. the advanced features of the VTF sound nice, and rough calculations put my room at ~2200 cubic feet, under the 3000 recomended for the stf2.

    question about the VTF vs. STF: since the STF doesnt have the variable tuning, does it act like a VTF in max loudness or max extension mode?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,052

    Default

    The STF-2 is like a VTF-2 in max extension mode.

    The STF-3 is like a VTF-3 in max output mode.

    -curtis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •