Page 254 of 271 FirstFirst ... 249250251252253254255256257258259 ... LastLast
Results 2,531 to 2,540 of 2707

Thread: The Tower Discussion Thread!

  1. #2531
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    29

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    Quote Originally Posted by BZ58 View Post
    I will be getting a pair of E15HP2's tomorrow. I won't be able to set them up for a few days because I'll be working. In the meantime, possibly someone will have a similar setup as mine.

    In a 3300 sq. ft. room I have an integrated amp, Yamaha A-S2200, that features left and right pre-outs for the subs. The speakers are Ascend Acoustics Towers with RAAL. I'll use REW eventually.

    Any tips on subwoofer settings?
    How do you like the Yamaha A-S2200 with the Sierra Towers?

  2. #2532
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    The best word I can think of to describe it is “clear”. The instruments sound real. I really like the Sierra Towers with the Yamaha.
    Last edited by BZ58; 02-07-2021 at 01:02 AM.

  3. #2533
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    14

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    :Question for Dave:

    Other people have mentioned they found the bass of the Towers to be lacking compared to other speakers. I have found this to be true as well. If I didn't have a subwoofer to fill in the low end I would not keep the Towers.

    How did you end up at the current config with the small dual-woofer configuration? Are there any easy mods one can make to pad the x-over to adjust levels?

  4. #2534
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    196

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    I’m not Dave, but I fail to see how the Sierra Towers are lacking in bass. They’re flat, not bloated. They’re about accuracy. Adding a sub only throws that off, and serves to accentuate bass by inflating it.

    Now if you’re talking about a sub covering the bass frequencies below where the Sierra Towers cover, that’s different. The bass doesn’t have to be bloated, and can stick to accuracy.
    Last edited by choirbass; 02-10-2021 at 07:20 PM.

  5. #2535
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    93

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    Quote Originally Posted by choirbass View Post
    I’m not Dave, but I fail to see how the Sierra Towers are lacking in bass. They’re flat, not bloated. They’re about accuracy. Adding a sub only throws that off, and serves to accentuate bass by inflating it.

    Now if you’re talking about a sub covering the bass frequencies below where the Sierra Towers cover, that’s different. The bass doesn’t have to be bloated, and can stick to accuracy.
    They’re fairly flat anechoic maybe, but in room is a totally different story. Subs give you an opportunity for optimal placement whereas speakers need to be set up to provide you with the proper imaging. A good sub properly integrated with your speakers will 99% of the time give you the best in room freq response and sound.

  6. #2536
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    I don't think you need a subwoofer with the towers, especially with music. I just got them to compliment the towers. I have them for a trial period. I hope I don't decide to return them.

  7. #2537
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    196

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    I second that about not needing a sub for music, or movies even. I only have the Sierra-2 with no sub so I can only imagine how much better the Sierra Towers are.

    Maybe it’s just me, but I’m sensitive to bass. I can do without earthshaking effects or muddled bass caused by a subwoofer. It doesn’t help.
    Last edited by choirbass; 02-11-2021 at 02:05 AM.

  8. #2538
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    1,421

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    IMO, the Towers have really good bass and do quite well with music w/o subwoofer(s). That said, I agree with djDanny - a good sub or two, properly integrated, elevates the listening experience.

  9. #2539
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Just outside Pearland, TX
    Posts
    310

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    Quote Originally Posted by choirbass View Post
    Maybe it’s just me, but I’m sensitive to bass. I can do without earthshaking effects or muddled bass caused by a subwoofer. It doesn’t help.
    If one is going to use a subwoofer, I think it's really important to get it right. A poor, or even badly-integrated, subwoofer can definitely be worse than no subwoofer at all. These poor people who think they'll make their setup sound better by dropping $100 on bad sub and just put it wherever... all you can do is pity them.

    A high-quality well-integrated subwoofer, though, is a thing of beauty. The problem is that in some rooms, it's hard to get good integration, even with high-quality subwoofers. I'm a big fan of sealed Rythmiks and Seatons because not only are they great, I think they're easier to integrate. It's easier with an AVR that has room correction, to be sure.

    As far as I'm concerned, it's worth both the effort and the expense. But then I'm a bassist...
    Luna Duo V2 LR, Titan Horizon V2, and Rythmik L22 & L12 in HT, Sierra-LXs in study, S-2EXs and Duo V2 C in bedroom, S-1 NrTs in dining room, S-1s at work, HTM-200s in kitchen. Brother owns CMT-340s and dad has a pair of CBM-170s.

  10. #2540
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    1,421

    Default Re: The Tower Discussion Thread!

    and if no avr with room correction, the miniDSP (+REW) works really well to integrate subs - I use this with my dual Rythmiks. The DSpeaker Antimode 8033 looks like it would do a good job, as well, and it's fully automated. Been thinking of picking one up to try it out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •