Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Sierra vs. Paradigm Signiture S2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    58

    Default Sierra vs. Paradigm Signiture S2

    I doubt anyone has had the chance to compare these speakers but I love the Paradigm Signatures. To date they are the best speakers I've heard. If the Sierras are on par with them I think I have no choice but to buy them at that point. The signatures are amazing, to get that performance for $800 would be an astounding deal.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    87

    Default

    I can't help you with this comparison directly, but for what it's worth, I preferred the CBM-170SE over the Paradigm Studio 20. It stands to reason that what you'll get with the Sierra-1 is something that costs about as much as the Studio 20 but with significantly better performance, just going by what people are generally saying. Whether it's on par with the S2, I can't say, but even if no one has made this exact comparison, it might be worth a try for the cost of shipping (that's up to you to decide, obviously).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I liked my 340/170 set-up better than my Studio40/20/470 set-up. In my Paradigm quest I should have stuck with 5 20s instead of 40s/470 across the front. I really liked the way 5 20s sounded together. To make a long reply longer, I sent back my 340s and am patiently awaiting my 3 Sierras for my front. I really was impressed by the 170s, so for now they will stay for surround duty. I know this didn't answer your question about Sigs but just a little info on what I traded for my Studios.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default

    A while back (6mo), My wife, mother-inlaw, and I went and auditioned Paradigm Signature S2's, Studio 20, and Studio 40's.
    After listening to Rock, Classical, Jazz, and hiphop my wife said:
    "The voices sound like their, like robots. The instruments don't sound real, they sound very tinny. The bass is muddy"

    The sales rep tried to offer a plethora of room accustic excuses.

    My wife didnt by it, and we left.

    Since then, I've listened to Paradigms at a few different dealers, and they all pretty much sounded as described above. I've also read similar reports in multiple forums. Needless to say, I will NOT be buying a Paragim speaker ever.

    The Sierra-1's, though a cheaper speaker by a few $1000, sounds much much better.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    413

    Default

    My first surround sound setup consisted of Paradigm v.2 monitor 7s, mini monitors, a cc370, a pdr-8, and then a pdr-12. I tried the v.3 studio 20 in home, and a cc-570. I heard some of the others at a store in GA which required a decent drive. The prices were sky high so I purchased studios via the internet. I felt the v.3 20 was the little engine that could, or the "less is more" in the studio series. It presented excellent off axis response. There were some areas of the frequency range that lacked tonal balance. The cc-570 has an excellent cabinet size, and it is a great performer by itself. Centers are often an obstacle, and the obstacle I found with the Paradigms was a sonic one. I never found a "match" I liked among the soundstages that the studio systems presented. I think Paradigms will always have their own 'signature' sound, and it's (always) a matter of preference combined with personal experience.

    Not much to say about signature other than opinions about the price points you enter vs the % performance increase over the studio series. Again, and especially at that level, it's very much up to the listener.

    **my sierras should arrive tomorrow...
    Last edited by metalaaron; 06-05-2007 at 05:13 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    373

    Default

    This is an interesting comparison, and I can truly understand where you're coming from.

    I too have loved the sound of the Paradigm Signature speakers for some time now, though their price has kept them out of my reach and out of my home I had heard the entire Paradigm lineup from bottom to top and I was never truly impressed until I heard the Signature speakers. I thought the rest of Paradigm's lineup could be bested by other competing speakers in the same price ranges.

    When I heard Ascend speakers for the first time, I was impressed. That was just an instant reaction, I didn't even know the price at the time! And while Ascend's speakers have continued to impress me, I have to admit that the Paradigm Signature speakers were still just a cut above - but obviously for a MUCH higher price

    I haven't heard the Sierra-1's yet. I hope the remedy that soon! But if what I have read is to be believed, they could very easily give the Signatures a good run. And when you factor in price, if the Sierra-1's are very close in sound, in terms of value it'll be no contest!

    I can't yet say that the Sierra-1's are as good as the Paradigm Signature speakers, but I can say this. When I've compared the CMT-340SE's to the Signatures, my thoughts echoed what has been said by those comparing the CMT-340SE's to the Sierra-1's.

    The 340SE's are excellent speakers. They impress me regardless. But when I compare them directly to the Paradigm Signatures, it's like a very slight fog is lifted. There's just a touch more "something" and it can be very difficult to describe. But this is exactly the same sort of description that people are giving when comparing the Sierra-1's, so I doubt it's just coincidence.

    I can't wait to hear the Sierra-1's. When I do, I'll know for sure. But just going by my own experience and what I'm reading people saying, I have confidence that the Sierra-1's are indeed on par with the Paradigm Signatures. And that has me VERY excited

    Jon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dover Pa
    Posts
    18

    Default

    I have not heard them side by side but I'll give this a shot...

    The signature bookshelves are probably more musical sounding. In other words they colour the sound, but in a pleasing way.

    I own the sierras and I would say they are cleaner and more detailed than the signatures.
    It all depends on what you like.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lomita, CA
    Posts
    285

    Default

    The Sierra's sure sound musical to me. Although, I think our definitions of musical may be different.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta Canada
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Wow guys - that's really tough. I remember once a thread a long time ago where some people were comparing subs. SVS this and HSU that, all else was crap - including the Servo -15. Well, just recently there was a thread on AVS where a guy could get a Servo from a buddy for real cheap ($800 I think, but don't quote me). He asked if he should do that or go with an SVS or HSU or something.

    Every single respondent told him to buy the Servo - no questions asked, and if he wasn't - give them the name of his buddy and they'd go buy it.

    So, now I'm just saying - but what would the reaction be - even here, if someone posted that they had an opportunity to get the Sig 2's for lets say $1000, or the Sierras for $849, what should I go with - how would you all respond? I really doubt any of you would honestly say take the Ascends.

    Now, that being said - I'm a very proud owner of the Classic Ascend 340's and 170's. David knows how to make a speaker, and most people have all been very consistent in rating the speakers in terms of their sound characteristics. I'm sure the Sierra is a terrific speaker- in fact I'm so sure I will be ordering some for my new H/T room once it's built (that's a ways off still as I have more pressing matters to spend my money on, or so my wife tells me).

    But the Sigs are a truely fine speaker, and have gone through a product change already. I would say the Sigs are better than the Sierras on paper and if all things were equal I would buy the Sigs in a heart beat.

    But things get interesting here - as all things are not equal. The Sierras are less than half price of the Sigs, and I am 100% confident that the Sigs are not twice as good as the Sierras, so since all things are not equal, unless money is no object - you always want the best value for your dollar. Clearly, the Sierra will win that against just about any speaker out there right now. I'm really stoked about this - David doesn't exactly come out with new offerings every 6 months or so. I envy all you current Sierra owners - I hope to join you one day. How do you all think a set of 7 Sierras would sound in a 14 x 24 x 9 room with sound treatments and a PC-Ultra plus cylinder Ultra mega whatever (can't they just call it a PC-Ultra 13) or two, being driven by separate of course (I was thinking Emotiva DMC-2 and MPS 1 using balanced connections and maybe getting 3 of those mega ultra thingies - since the DMC 2 (well, the DMC-1 anyway) has 3 sub outs - may as well use 'em if they're there )
    Last edited by Kpt_Krunch; 06-22-2007 at 11:22 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kpt_Krunch
    I would say the Sigs are better than the Sierras on paper and if all things were equal I would buy the Sigs in a heart beat.
    What it says on paper doesn't tell you how it sounds and whether you'll like that sonic signature. If all things were equal, I'd take the less expensive one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •