Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Dave, how about a shootout

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    259

    Default Dave, how about a shootout

    Dave, can you put up a thread that has the decay of S-1 v/s 340SE? Specs of one v/s the other? Interested to see at what % the S-1 are an improvement. Possible to do this for us? Interested to see the visual representation of the measurements side by side.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,055

    Default

    a CSD graph for both is available:

    CMT-340SE


    Sierra-1
    -curtis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Pretty easy to cut and paste them into a post.

    340SE-


    Sierra 1-

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,055

    Default

    Too funny...we posted at the same time!
    -curtis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    119

    Default

    can anyone authortatively explain why CSD graphs have no data plotted in the lower left ? i.e., low frequency vs high time

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Well not authoritative but, I think you run into ground plane issues and need an anechoic chamber to measure below that point.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    913

    Default

    There's some math (that I can't quote without digging up reference material) about how the amount of time you can measure (msec on the right axis in these images) varies with frequency. Essentially, as the frequency lowers, the time window shrinks, which displays as that cut off in the corner of the graphs.

    If the graph was expanded to show a bigger time window, you'd see that cut off curve of no data arcing into higher frequencies.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BradJudy
    There's some math (that I can't quote without digging up reference material) about how the amount of time you can measure (msec on the right axis in these images) varies with frequency. Essentially, as the frequency lowers, the time window shrinks, which displays as that cut off in the corner of the graphs.

    If the graph was expanded to show a bigger time window, you'd see that cut off curve of no data arcing into higher frequencies.

    seems like a reasonable answer. It' just bugs me there is data that lies directly against the line, and one would assume on the other side of the line that is not getting recorded.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dallas
    seems like a reasonable answer. It' just bugs me there is data that lies directly against the line, and one would assume on the other side of the line that is not getting recorded.
    It is recorded but it isn't accurate. Brad did a fuller explanation then I did. My understanding is the low frequencies are really close together and it is hard to gate out the reflections with how fast they arrive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •