Thanx!!! I am looking forward to your opinion, as I am sure others are as wellOriginally Posted by curtis
|
Thanx!!! I am looking forward to your opinion, as I am sure others are as wellOriginally Posted by curtis
L/R - Sierra Towers
Center - Sierra Horizon Tower
Surrounds - 200SE
SW - Dual PSA XV15's
TV - Panasonic TC-P65VT60
A/V Receiver - Denon AVR-4311CI
Blu-ray/DVD - Sony BDP-S5100
DVR STB - Motorola Arris X1
Curtis, did you ever do the comparison, or is it in another thread.
There is another thread somewhere....but yes, I have compared. The Sierra is a better speaker all the way around. If you have a larger room that you need to fill with sound at loud levels...especially for HT, then 340SE would best the Sierra...but that is the only scenario that favors the 340SE that I can think of.
-curtis
Thanks, I have the 340SE's and love them, listen to a lot of multi channel music and wondered if it is worth the extra money for the seirra's. Wish i lived in So. Cal so I could hear them. ha. So far no listing in Atlanta area to audition.
In my case, it was absolutely worth the money. Having said that, I am using the 340 se's for HT, and the Sierras strictly for two channel music. I think the 340's are fantastic speakers. I got the Sierra's because a Mcintosh amp and preamp fell into my lap, the Sierras are incredible speakers and I didn't want to take the 340's out of my Ht.
Jim
CMT-340SE2 Mains & Center, CBM-170SE Surrounds, Rythmik F15, Emotiva XMC-1, Emotiva XPA-5
Drewface,
That sounds like a great idea!
I always lusted after McIntosh when I was younger, but I could never afford them, thankfully that has since changed.
The ascends sound amazing with my amp(s)
Jim