Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: 340 to 340SE upgrade

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    24

    Default 340 to 340SE upgrade

    Anyone here done this? Would you say it was worth it? What sound differences can I expect? I currently have 340's as my L and R with a 340SE for my center. 170's (non-SE) are my surrounds.

    Thanks,

    Eric

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, New York
    Posts
    1,222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airs
    Anyone here done this? Would you say it was worth it? What sound differences can I expect? I currently have 340's as my L and R with a 340SE for my center. 170's (non-SE) are my surrounds.
    Yep, I did it. The SE's are different but not night and day different. They do go a good 10db lower in my room. I don't use a sub for music so this is important to me.
    With Ascend's return policy, I'd encourage anyone to A/B the Classics and the SE's. I can see some folks still prefering the Classics but I'm guessing that most will opt for the SE's. If you have a larger listening area or sit more than 10 feet from your speakers, I'm pretty sure the SE's will get the nod.
    Dave F. has posted the differences and I really can't add anything of value to that.

    David

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    000000N 0000000E
    Posts
    771

    Default

    10dB lower huh?
    Jon O.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    259

    Default yep

    Yes, that 10Hz makes a big difference! I am glad mine drop into the 40's, that means I don't have to use the sub for most music...
    Last edited by audibleconnoisseur; 02-13-2007 at 05:53 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, New York
    Posts
    1,222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonnyozero3
    10dB lower huh?
    One should not write and do work at the same time. Brad and Curtis have caught me on some real blunders when I've been writing from my desk. Welcome to the club and I'm sure you won't be the last member.

    David

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    000000N 0000000E
    Posts
    771

    Default

    haha, it's all good. Was just a little funny

    For our casual readers - he meant Hz, not dB.
    Jon O.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Found some more posts by DaveF and decided to bite the bullet

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    259

    Default happy

    you won't be disappointed! it is not the ringing bass that you may get from other speakers, but punchy and tight, as well as smooth on the high end. heads up, break them in before you really "get on them" or you will be making a second purchase!

    FWIW, I found myself having some fun two nights ago at the speakers expense and with my Denon 1905, was pushing the speakers to peaks of 112dB! That is SERIOUSLY loud and I don't recommend doing this if you have an underpowered amplifier but the point is that they play very clean and smooth at this level and I sustained that dB for about three minutes during a particular Josh Groban song. The power in this man's voice at this level can be astonishing. They will play loud an proud or demure at your leisure, just learn quickly how far NOT to push them - then walk right up to that line all the time and have some fun


    Let us know what you think but remember to play about 20-30 hours at moderate room levels before you open them up to test them!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airs
    Anyone here done this? Would you say it was worth it? What sound differences can I expect? I currently have 340's as my L and R with a 340SE for my center. 170's (non-SE) are my surrounds.

    Thanks,

    Eric
    Would I say its worth it? No.

    Off all the Ascends Ive owned so far, the one i enjoyed the most was my former 340C (non-SE) that i had to sell due to going from a CRT to an LCD. Forcing the vocals out of that speaker produced a beautiful, room filling sound.

    I eventually "upgraded" my 170 regular L/R to 340 SE L/R and was thinking i'm going to regain at least the "vocal" power of my old 340 Center. To my ameteur ears, that just didn't happen.

    So i didn't compare the two directly, but i can say it must not be that big a difference.

    Finally, if you use a H/K like me, you're optimal crossover point for either speaker will be 60hz, since the SE's cant do 40hz at -3 db, so the new capabilities of the SE become mostly academic (though i acknowledge there is minor "spillover" of sound below crossover, it would be picked up by the sub regardless).
    Last edited by azanon; 02-13-2007 at 03:22 PM.
    Sierra-1 - Mains+Center
    Surrounds - HTM200SEs (x4 in back, and x2 Atmos)
    Sub - SVS PB-2000
    Receiver - Onkyo TX-RZ1100
    Oppo Darbee Edition Blue Ray
    Sony 4K blu ray player

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Minnesota, US
    Posts
    418

    Default

    So Azanon, are you saying you no longer have a center channel?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •