Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 77

Thread: Squeezebox sound quality vs CD, and Panny XR55 info

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oaktown, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default Squeezebox sound quality vs CD, and Panny XR55 info

    Aside from speakers, DAC's are the most important part of the digital audio chain. Never underestimate their effect on the sound... it's HUGE!

    shane
    Yes Eve, I like to watch.

    My setup:
    http://www.fototime.com/5EF1F78FC789849/orig.jpg
    HT: 340SE's Front & Center - 340 Classic's Surround, SVS PB110-ISD.
    Office (2-ch): 170SE's

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie
    No, I was using the analog connections to a NAD c372 in the shop. At home I also use analog connections to my Panny 55 right now; at the time of the Marantz vs. Sony ES test I was using NAD separates also with analog connections.

    I didn't think to lend you the digital interconnect with the 563.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinn
    I didn't think to lend you the digital interconnect with the 563.
    Not sure the NAD c372 in the shop would even have a digital connection. My NAD separates certainly don't.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie
    Not sure the NAD c372 in the shop would even have a digital connection. My NAD separates certainly don't.
    It doesn't. Great integrated amp though....would be on my possibles list if I were to set-up a two-channel system.
    -curtis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I am still blown away by TV and movie performance, but am not too impressed so far with CD music. It doesn't sound as full as I'd like even though it is very detailed. Seems like I'm missing good midrange/upper bass and highs are too bright.

    I was testing with the Kelly Clarkson Breakaway CD and Clay Aiken's CD.

    I have 340SEs across the front with SVS 25-31CS sub, Panasonic SA-XR50 (100hz crossover), and Sony DVP-NS75H.

    Is the problem with:
    1. The CD capabilities of the DVP-NS75H
    2. The 100hz crossover and/or the Panasonic SA-XR50
    3. CD quality of the CDs I tested
    4. Something else

    I tried stereo with sub, stereo full range without sub, and DTS Neo:6. Adjusting the bass helped a little bit, but I can only do that in stereo mode.

    I think I'll eventually try the SA-XR57 to see if the combination of dual amping, 80hz crossover, and upgraded electronics (I assume) improve the sound quality.

    Am I expecting too much out of the speakers?
    Last edited by Grayson73; 05-25-2006 at 01:24 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oaktown, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Grayson.
    How are you feeding your receiver?
    Analog or digital feeds (coax or Toslink) out of the DVD player?

    shane
    Yes Eve, I like to watch.

    My setup:
    http://www.fototime.com/5EF1F78FC789849/orig.jpg
    HT: 340SE's Front & Center - 340 Classic's Surround, SVS PB110-ISD.
    Office (2-ch): 170SE's

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shane55
    Grayson.
    How are you feeding your receiver?
    Analog or digital feeds (coax or Toslink) out of the DVD player?

    shane
    Digital coax

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oaktown, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grayson73
    Digital coax
    Well there you have it...
    You have just eliminated the possibility that it is inferior DAC's in the CD player.

    It still may be the receiver contributing to the overall quality you are experiencing, but that should be minimal. I think Brad and jermy are right-on about it being just the difference between what you are used to and the clear neutrality of the Ascends.

    In other threads this has been brought up and discussed to death, but a 'neutral' speaker is not what most people are used to listening to. There is inherent coloration in most speakers, whether it be lower-mids to give them 'warmth' or upper-mids to accentuate vocals. Ascends seem to be free of most of it. It is a very good thing, but might take a bit to get used to.

    Also, for serious listening tests try sources that are not produced for low-end playback systems. These types of pop releases are EQ’d with inexpensive consumer stereos or iPods in mind. Play some of your CD’s of well-recorded and well-produced acoustic and/or classical to see how well these speakers produce good sound.

    GI-GO (garbage in – garbage out).

    At some point yes, a better receiver with adjustable x-over points will be important to get the most out of the Ascends.

    Cheers and good luck.

    shane
    Last edited by shane55; 05-25-2006 at 01:53 PM.
    Yes Eve, I like to watch.

    My setup:
    http://www.fototime.com/5EF1F78FC789849/orig.jpg
    HT: 340SE's Front & Center - 340 Classic's Surround, SVS PB110-ISD.
    Office (2-ch): 170SE's

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Grayson,

    I don't think the problem is with the Ascends but with the Panny. I had the XR55 and found it to be harsh and bright in the upper frequencies and lacking in impact in the lower regions. However, my XR55 did have nice imaging, was very quite and seemed to cast a large sound stage. The digital sheen, for me, was the last straw and I sold it and I am now looking for a new amp. Perhaps a tube preamp would take the hard edges off the Panny. Digital amps are still in their infancy and I think that, currently, there are better options in analogue receivers such as the Outlaw that may cost more but in the long run will provide you with more satisfaction. I am going the separates route and have started with the purchase of a tube preamp and am looking for a good traditional power amp. For home theater you are probably best going with a quality traditional AVR.

    Raja

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, New York
    Posts
    1,222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rajacat
    I don't think the problem is with the Ascends but with the Panny. Raja
    It's fine that you express this opinion but it's not widely held. I, along with others on this Forum, have found the Panny to be an excellent match for the Ascends.
    I think Brad has expressed what I feel is the best course of action.

    David

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •