Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Whats up with the huge delay in updating to SE pics?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by starcycle
    thanks. i just photoshopped one to have no logo, and it definitely looks better with a logo than without one. the logo itself could use some work, but that's another discussion.
    That logo is actually rather new and was selected by Ascend from customer submissions after the community harassed them about the older 80's metal band style logo. I think the new one is quite nice.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Madera,CA,USA
    Posts
    201

    Thumbs up

    I'd love to see the logos applied as a silk screen on the fabric itself, of course, the price would go up alot doing that.
    Feel Free to visit my website:
    The Bailey's Home Theatre in Our Living Room

    Equipment List:
    Hitachi 57F59 HD CRT RPTV
    Outlaw 990/7125 PrePro/Amp
    Panasonic BD10 Blu-Ray Player
    Mains: Ascend CMT-340M
    Center: Ascend CMT-340C
    Surrounds: Ascend CBM-170
    Sub: SVS 25-31PC

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by starcycle
    about the "cube" shape that Eddie mentioned, i've always wondered: is that an intentional design decision relating to the sound quality, or did it just kind of end up that way because of manufacturing considerations, etc.? i mean, are there specific reasons why the speaker is not a more traditional taller and narrower shape? i imagine it's designed that way intentionally, but i just wonder about the technical reasons related to how it affects the sound.
    I actually spoke to DaveF about the shape of the 170. He said they tried many different shapes and said "this" one sounded and/or measured the best....right down to the radiused edges.
    -curtis

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curtis
    I actually spoke to DaveF about the shape of the 170. He said they tried many different shapes and said "this" one sounded and/or measured the best....right down to the radiused edges.
    that's incredible. i assumed it played a part, i just didn't know to what extent.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan Beach, California
    Posts
    7,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by starcycle
    that's incredible. i assumed it played a part, i just didn't know to what extent.
    all in the name of sound.
    -curtis

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    311

    Default

    ...still no new 340SE pics...

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, New York
    Posts
    1,222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie
    ...still no new 340SE pics...
    I think the photographer is currently employed in the shipping dept.

    David

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oaktown, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bikeman
    I think the photographer is currently employed in the shipping dept.

    David
    Well... he's doing a great job!
    Yes Eve, I like to watch.

    My setup:
    http://www.fototime.com/5EF1F78FC789849/orig.jpg
    HT: 340SE's Front & Center - 340 Classic's Surround, SVS PB110-ISD.
    Office (2-ch): 170SE's

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bikeman
    I think the photographer is currently employed in the shipping dept.

    David
    very, very plausible! LOL

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    000000N 0000000E
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curtis
    I actually spoke to DaveF about the shape of the 170. He said they tried many different shapes and said "this" one sounded and/or measured the best....right down to the radiused edges.
    I'm curious why the 340 has sharp edges...I'm assuming in that configuration there wasn't a difference, or maybe it was a decision for aesthetics because the 340 was originally a center designed to go ontop or below a TV. Hmmm.
    Jon O.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •