Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Which 5 speakers for HT?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    33

    Default Which 5 speakers for HT?

    I'm considering a speaker upgrade for my HT around May and I'm considering Ascend Speakers for the upgrade.

    I know I'd get the 340 center for the center channel (obviously) but I'm wondering what to do for the Front L/R and surround L/R? I was thinking 170's for the front and 200's for the rear (for a 5.1 system). And in the future I could go with either a pair of 340's or 170's to create a 7.1 system.

    I guess my question is, should I go with 4 170's or 2 170's and 2 200's? I'm interested in HT duty only as I have a stereo setup elsewhere in the house.

    Thanks guys, other oppinions are very welcome. Oh, and I'll be pairing whatever I get with an Outlaw LFM-1 subwoofer.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    11

    Default

    4 170's are going to be better than 2 170's and 2 200's, of course. But the cost is different, so you'll have to decide if it is worth it to you. You'll probably be very happy with whatever choice you make so...flip a coin, heads=4x170, tails=4x170.

    Actually I don't know if others feel this way, but when you put 170s into rear surround duty, you kind of feel bad. It's such a nice and totally capable speaker, and all it ever gets to play is ambience, car noises, rain, wind, leaves ruffling, etc... poor thing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    42

    Default

    For HT only, 5 HTM-200 will do the job pretty well.
    You save space, they can be wall mounted and the sound is just great.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorge59
    For HT only, 5 HTM-200 will do the job pretty well.
    You save space, they can be wall mounted and the sound is just great.
    Yeah, that's what I decided too. Even though I enjoy 5.1 hi-res music, in my room the 200s are a better fit. On the other hand, I think getting the pair of 170's was just another 80 bucks. So for me it was just about the room and in the end I went with the 200s. I just ordered today. Can't wait to have them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    33

    Default

    I guess I'm trying to figure what to take advantage of. If I have 4 170's, there should be a seemless blend of sound. I was thinking that the HTM 200 might disperse the sound a little better in back because of the extra drivers but that they might not blend quite as good. Does that seem right?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB, Canada
    Posts
    143

    Default

    It might seem right, but in practice the blend is close enough to be thoroughly convincing. The HTM-200s, used with a good sub, are an excellent surround for any Ascend HT-only setup.

    It's not wrong to go for CBM-170 surrounds, it's just that they're bulkier and harder to wall-mount, and the gains for home theater use will be marginal at best.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Do the 200's use different tweeters?

    Is there any reason to get the 170's over the 200's?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •