Do the CBM-170s "lack top-end extension?"
In this thread: http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/1/136535.html
One poster posted this link:
http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...cend%5Fcbm170/
and interpreted the numbers like this:
"Edster, if you look at the frequency response graph, you'll notice the -3db points are approx. 80hz in the low end and 10Khz on the top end. The bass response drops very quickly below 100hz, which may be a good thing, since 99.9% of all homes on the planet are not able to do really low bass anyway. What is somewhat bothersome is the lack of top end extension. Although not much music is above 10khz there are harmonics that reach those ranges frequently. The midrange looks very smooth. There is some noise at approx 50hz, probably from the port that seems to increase as spl increases. Just posted it for your benefit. Nice to see your speakers performance, no?"
Agree/disagree? Comments?
I'm fairly clueless around this much techie stuff so would like to hear your thoughts on this...